They includes five things: confident worry beliefs (“Alarming helps us to avoid dilemmas in the future”), thinking regarding the uncontrollability and possibility (“My personal worrying was risky for my situation”), cognitive competence (“We have little depend on in my thoughts getting terms and conditions and you can labels”), general bad opinions (“Easily didn’t manage a worrying envision, and it simply happened, it would be my personal fault”), and you may intellectual notice-awareness (“I believe a great deal from the my personal opinion”). The metacognition survey are scored inside an effective 4 part scale regarding 1 (“don’t agree”) to 4 (“concur quite”) together with an effective Chronbach’s alpha = .88. The fresh new metacognition questionnaire has been used commonly within the non-logical trials particularly smokers and children [forty-two, 45]. A complete score was calculated in order to create an inventory of metacognition each fellow member.
New Compulsive-Fanatical Directory is actually good 42-goods mind-report questionnaire, evaluating the seriousness of certain obsessions and compulsions out-of OCD in the adults . The brand new obsessive-obsessive list consists of eight subscales that are included with laundry (“I clean my personal give more often or longer than needed”), examining (“I go back once again to places to make certain that I have not damage people”), doubt (“Regardless if I do something carefully I’m this is not slightly best”), purchasing (“I have disappointed if the someone else has changed how i enjoys build my some thing”), obsessing (“I find it difficult to deal with my personal view”), hoarding (“I assemble one thing I don’t need”), and neutralising (“I believe I need to recite certain number”). Which collection was scored for the good 4 area Likert scale, from (“definitely not”) in order to 4 (“extremely”) along with a Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A complete score try calculated to make one to score per participant about O-C symptoms.
A chance shot out-of college students participated in the study. People had been first and foremost presented with details about the study and you can considering the ability to ask questions about any of it. Once offering agree, per participant offered demographic pointers, following was presented with the fresh five surveys inside the a beneficial counterbalanced acquisition to resolve during the their own day. In the event the participant accomplished they try thanked and you can debriefed. Every material and procedures accompanied the moral advice and procedures detail by detail from the American Mental Association and had been checked and you may recognized by School off Hertfordshire ethics committee (Number:14149216).
Analysis is processed having forgotten thinking, outliers and you may assumptions regarding mathematical research in advance of any analysis . All of the parameters got appropriate thinking to possess skewness and you may kurtosis no significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of the millions of all computed indexes revealed confident and you will high associations between them (Table 1). The best relationship are involving the spiders regarding county and you may characteristic nervousness, followed by the brand new association between stress sensitivity, metacognition and you may O-C periods.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor Hayward escort reviews of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.